Does continuing service without a signed renewal make the contract valid?

If you sent a renewal for a 12-month term and the client kept paying and communicating as if the deal continued, that behavior may show they accepted the offer. Courts often look at conduct: if one side makes a clear offer and the other acts in a way that signals agreement, an "implied contract" might exist — even without a signature.

That said, enforceability depends on several details:

• How clear the renewal offer was: Did it spell out the new 12-month terms plainly?
• What the original agreement required: If the contract says renewal must be in writing or signed, courts may reject an implied renewal based on conduct alone.
• How consistent the client's actions were: Partial or limited performance — like paying a single invoice — may not prove acceptance of all renewal terms. Courts look for conduct that clearly supports the full renewed commitment

Generally, continuing to perform under the new terms (providing services and accepting payment) can be strong evidence of a valid agreement. But the specifics of the contract and the client's behavior will make all the difference.

What to consider in your specific situation

While ongoing payment and communication can support an implied renewal, your case may differ based on important details. Factors to consider include:

• The type of service agreement and how renewals are normally handled.
• The exact wording in your original contract about renewals or extensions.
• Any state or local contract laws that could affect enforceability.
• Whether your client's actions clearly matched the renewal terms or only some of them.
• The financial and business impact if the client disputes the renewal.

Because every situation is different, it can help to get information specific to your business. You can ask your own question in Rocket Copilot to explore how implied renewals usually work, or connect with a Legal Pro to learn more.