Explore more questions about governing law clauses
Governing law clauses specify which state or country’s laws will be used to interpret a contract. These questions explain how governing law is chosen and why it matters when disputes arise.
My contract currently requires law and courts in the state where I am based, but my client wants arbitration based in their state. I want sample language that's neutral, enforceable, and doesn't put me at a disadvantage.
You can revise your contract to replace or narrow the court venue language and add a mutual arbitration clause that applies equally to both sides. A neutral clause usually makes arbitration mandatory for both parties, names a trusted arbitration provider, uses clear rules, and separates the law that governs the contract from the place where arbitration happens.
The goal is to avoid giving either side an unfair home-state advantage. A balanced clause can use a neutral location, shared costs, and the Federal Arbitration Act for enforceability, while still naming the state law that applies to the contract itself.
A mutual arbitration clause usually says that any dispute related to the contract must be resolved by binding arbitration, not court. It should name the arbitration provider, such as AAA or JAMS, and identify the rules that will apply.
It should also say whether one arbitrator or three will hear the case, where the arbitration will take place, and how costs will be handled. A common neutral approach is to split arbitration costs equally and have each side pay its own legal fees unless the arbitrator decides otherwise.
The biggest issues are venue, governing law, and mutuality. Venue is where the arbitration happens. If your client wants their state and you want yours, a neutral third location or a fallback under the provider's rules may be more balanced.
Governing law is different from venue. The Federal Arbitration Act often governs whether the arbitration clause is enforceable, while a chosen state's law can still govern the contract itself. Making the clause mutual also matters. It should clearly require both parties to arbitrate, not just one side.
Even if a general clause works in many contracts, your facts may change what feels fair or practical.
A clear dispute clause can give both sides more predictability and less friction before problems start. Since every situation is different, consider more information through Rocket Copilot, a Legal Pro, or a legal document review to move forward with confidence.
Governing law clauses specify which state or country’s laws will be used to interpret a contract. These questions explain how governing law is chosen and why it matters when disputes arise.
Browse related topics to learn more about contracts, common clauses, business filings, and other legal issues that may apply to your situation.
At Rocket Lawyer, we follow a rigorous editorial policy to ensure every article is helpful, clear, and as accurate and up-to-date as possible. This page was created, edited and reviewed by trained editorial staff who specialize in translating complex legal topics into plain language, then reviewed by experienced attorneys to ensure legal accuracy.
Please note: This page offers general legal information, but not legal advice tailored for your specific legal situation. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated isn't a law firm or a substitute for one. For further information on this topic, you can Ask an Attorney.

Laura Bojart is an SEO copywriter and editor at Rocket Lawyer. She researches legal and business topics and translates complex ideas into clear, practical content for everyday readers. With her background in journalism and endless curiosity, she approaches each subject by asking the questions readers are likely to have first, making legal information approachable and easy to understand even to those with no legal background.